Scoring methodology

Purpose first, result second, action third

Our model rewards category fit and the complete respondent experience, with extra weight on what happens after the score.

The first filter is purpose

We assign every product to either Evaluate or Attract. Evaluate covers hiring, skills testing, workforce development, screening, and standardized personality instruments. Attract covers client-facing diagnostics designed to help a prospective buyer understand their situation and choose a useful next step.

A product can be competent at both, but the ranking uses the job it is structurally optimized to perform.

Weighted score

Category fit receives 25 percent. Scoring depth receives 15 percent. Personal result clarity receives 15 percent. Contact and data handling receives 10 percent. Score-aware email capability receives 10 percent. Action after the result receives 10 percent. Verification and integrity controls receive 5 percent. Publishing and accessibility receive 5 percent. Price and free access receive 5 percent.

Evidence standard

We use public demos and product tours when available, then cross-check observed behavior against current vendor documentation. Pricing is taken from vendor-owned pricing pages. When a vendor withholds a starting figure, we show Custom quote rather than importing an estimate from a reseller or directory.

First-person observations appear only where we interacted with the public experience. Other claims are written as documented capabilities and linked to their source.

Freshness

Price claims are scheduled for quarterly re-verification. The guide is reviewed monthly for material feature changes, product repositioning, broken sources, and dateModified accuracy.

Category fit25%
Scoring and result clarity30%
Contact, email, and next action30%
Controls, publishing, and price15%

A clinical boundary

Validated clinical screeners are instruments, not a general software lane. Reproducing a question set inside a builder does not create clinical validation.