Editorial policy

Specific claims, named lanes, visible sources

The publication uses a purpose-led evaluation model and links material product and price claims to vendor-owned pages.

Category decisions

We do not force every assessment product into the same job. Dedicated hiring, psychometric, exam, and client-diagnostic products are evaluated against the work they are built to do.

Claims and sources

Material feature and pricing claims should be verifiable. Vendor pages are preferred for product capability and price. Validated instruments are described within their documented clinical, psychometric, or regulatory boundaries.

Corrections and updates

When a factual error is confirmed, we correct the page and record a material change in the changelog. Readers can use the contact page to submit evidence.

Language

Badge language is limited to Our pick. We avoid vague superlatives, ownership statements, and claims that cannot be tested or sourced.